|
 |
Home >
APEIS > Design |
|
Design of the Asia-Pacific Environmental
Innovation
Strategy Project (APEIS) |
 |
Endorsed by ECO-ASIA PANEL on 29 July , 2002
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
1. |
Background |
|
The adoption of Agenda 21 at the Earth Summit
in 1992 prompted countries, international organizations, non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and other stakeholders around the world
to strengthen actions to address global environmental problems.
Nevertheless, as the world prepares ten years later for the
World Summit on Sustainable Development to be held in South
Africa, the vicious cycle of environmental degradation and
poverty continues to worsen and the ideal of sustainable development
seems further out of reach. More than ever, today the world
needs tangible answers to the question of how to achieve sustainable
development.
Conditions are deteriorating in the Asia-Pacific region, home
of about 60 percent of the global population, a region experiencing
rapid population and economic growth. Many problems exist
simultaneously here, because many countries are at different
stages of economic development. Examples include the health
impacts of industrial pollution, degradation of natural resources
caused by industrial development, increases of pollution caused
by urban activities associated with greater use of automobiles
and a concentration of the population in cities, and increases
in greenhouse gas emissions.
To solve such problems, the world needs a tangible path toward
sustainable development and clearer plans for implementation.
As one step in this direction, since 1993 the ECO ASIA Long-Term
Perspective Project (LTPP) has provided policy-makers in the
Asia-Pacific region with a scientific basis for policy formulation
to achieve sustainable development. Its outcomes were reported
to the Environment Congress for Asia and the Pacific (ECO
ASIA) 2001 held in Tokyo, Japan on October 13-14, 2001. The
participants endorsed the draft of the final report of LTPP
Phase II, and also expressed expectations regarding the follow-up
activities of the LTPP, i.e., those to be undertaken via the
Asia-Pacific Environmental Innovation Strategy Project (APEIS).
The launch of APEIS was proposed at the ECO ASIA 2001, with
the anticipation that it would further the outcomes of the
LTPP for sustainable development in the Asia-Pacific region.
The participants in the congress expressed their high expectations
for the new initiative and gave suggestions for its better
implementation, pointing out the need for action-oriented
research, information transparency, and capacity building,
and the value of maximizing participation by countries throughout
the region-particularly as they undertake to implement Agenda
21. After a comprehensive discussion, the congress endorsed
with appreciation the launch of APEIS as well as the establishment
of the ECO ASIA Panel for its coordination[HU1].
The basic concept of APEIS is represented in paragraph 94
of the "Draft Plan of Implementation for the World Summit
on Sustainable Development" developed at the fourth session
of preparatory committee for the World Summit on Sustainable
Development (WSSD) held May and June 2002 in Bali, Indonesia.
The relevant part of the paragraph reads:
94. Assist developing countries, through international cooperation,
to enhance their capacity in their efforts to address issues
pertaining to environmental protection including in their
formulation and implementation of policies for environmental
management and protection, [including actions at all levels
to][with action to]: |
|
(a) |
 |
[Agreed] Improve their use of science
and technology for environmental monitoring, assessment
models, accurate database and integrated information
systems; |
(b) |
|
[Agreed] Promote and, where appropriate,
improve their use of satellite technologies for quality
data collection, verification and updating and further
improvement of aerial and ground-based observations,
in support of their efforts to collect quality, accurate,
long-term, consistent and reliable data; |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
2. |
Objectives and Key Concepts |
 |
2.1 What are the Objectives of this Project? |
|
The objectives of APEIS are three-fold: |
|
(a) |
 |
To develop scientific knowledge-based tools
and innovative strategy options to promote informed decision-making
for sustainable development, for the use of policy makers
in the Asia-Pacific region as a common asset in the region |
(b) |
|
To promote regional cooperation and capacity
building, so as to enable Asia-Pacific countries to formulate
and implement their own policies for environmental management
and protection that take into account their national circumstances,
making use of the scientific tools and options developed,
through participation and collaboration in the Project |
(c) |
|
To propose a model of a concrete regional
initiative that substantiates and realizes the Plan of
Implementation for the World Summit on Sustainable Development,
that can be presented from this region to the rest of
the world |
|
|
2.2 What are the Key Concepts of this Project? |
|
In order to achieve the above objectives, APEIS
will be further designed and implemented along the lines of
the following basic concepts: |
|
(a) |
 |
Ensure the highest possible level of participation
and collaboration of countries, relevant organizations
and other stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific region |
(b) |
|
Create a framework in which scientific activities
and policy makers interact synergistically and constructively |
(c) |
|
Fully incorporate and utilize resources
of existing regional initiatives, activities and projects
by promoting collaboration and coordination, e.g., with
ECO ASIA, the Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
(APN) and relevant international research projects |
(d) |
|
Consider and reflect specific needs and
diversified national circumstances in the Asia-Pacific
countries |
|
|
2.3 Why is this Project "Innovative"?
|
|
The innovation in APEIS can be found in the objectives,
processes, outcomes and technical elements, as follows: |
|
* |
 |
Innovation in objectives and processes,
i.e., development of scientific knowledge-based tools
and strategy options readily available for policy makers
as a regional common asset, through dynamic interaction
between scientific activities and policy makers |
* |
|
Innovation in outcomes, i.e., proposals
of innovative policy instruments and environmental strategy
options including environmentally sound/sustainable technologies
and policy integration beyond conventional policy instruments |
* |
|
Innovation in technical elements, i.e.,
employment of innovative methodologies such as satellite-
and ground-based integrated monitoring and environment-economy
integrated models |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
3. |
Outline of the Project |
|
3.1 Framework of the Project |
 |
APEIS is composed of three sub-projects, namely
the Integrated Environmental Monitoring (IEM), the Integrated
Environmental Assessment (IEA) and the Research on Innovative
and Strategic Policy Options (RISPO) sub-projects. APEIS support
functions include networking and capacity building, and information
sharing and outreach. Although each sub-project could function
as an individual research project, synergistic effects are highly
anticipated as a result of their active interaction because
they collectively cover major elements required for environmental
policy-making, i.e., understanding of environmental conditions,
assessment and future prediction, and formulation of policy
options. Examples of tangible synergistic effects, include the
following: |
|
* |
 |
Improvement and verification of simulation
models making use of the data acquired from the integrated
environmental monitoring |
* |
|
Quantification of the environmental and
economic effects of strategy options using the environment-economy
integrated models |
* |
|
Identification of target issues and sites
in studying strategy options using the outcomes of the
integrated environmental monitoring |
|
|
Outcomes of APEIS activities will be reported
at international forums in which policy makers of the Asia-Pacific
region participate, and will provide a scientific basis for
discussions. In addition, it is anticipated that policy makers
will provide policy guidance so that the scientific activities
respond to their needs. |
|
APEIS seeks links with other mutually supportive
activities at international and regional levels. Such activities
include the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), the APN, and
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) project entitled "National
Performance Assessment and Subregional Strategic Environment
Framework in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS)" which
is being developed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in collaboration
with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the National
Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) of Japan, and the
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). The APN
is a strong partner of APEIS in terms of networking and capacity
building. In addition, its research activities and resources
concerning integrated monitoring and assessment can bring potential
participators/contributors to APEIS. |
|
APEIS will be represented to the world as an Asia-Pacific
model of regional initiatives in the form of "Partnership/Initiatives
to Implement Agenda 21" to realize the relevant part of
the Plan of Implementation for the World Summit on Sustainable
Development, and will be reported at the WSSD to be held August
through September 2002 in South Africa. |
|
 |
|
3.2 Major Components of the Project |
|
(1) |
 |
Integrated Environmental Monitoring (IEM) |
|
|
Rapid agricultural and urban development
in the Asia-Pacific region has caused forest degradation,
desertification, salinization, water resource depletion,
soil loss and other serious environmental problems. These
impacts have become serious constraints on sustainable
development in the region. To take measures to counteract
further depletion and degradation, it is first of all
necessary to collect accurate and reliable data on the
present conditions and changes in natural resources and
the environment. |
|
|
The IEM sub-project aims to develop an integrated
environmental monitoring system that can cover the entire
Asia-Pacific region, mainly by using the MODIS (Moderate
Resolution Imaging Spectrometer) sensor mounted on the
EOS (Earth Observation System)-Terra satellite, and through
cooperative research with countries in the region. This
sub-project consists of the following components: |
|
|
* |
 |
Establishment of a network of satellite
data-receiving stations and analytical systems for
MODIS data that covers the Asia-Pacific region |
* |
|
Development of a ground-truth observation
network for various ecosystem types to validate
satellite remote-sensing data in the Asia-Pacific
region |
* |
|
Integrated monitoring of environmental
disasters such as dust storms, transboundary air
pollution, floods, marine pollution and oil spills,
forest fires, and so forth |
* |
|
Integrated monitoring of environmental
indices and degradation such as desertification,
salinization and deforestation, as well as land
use and land cover changes |
* |
|
Study of land-atmosphere processes
and ecological functions at the watershed scale,
and eventually, modeling of water resources and
agricultural productivity |
|
(2) |
|
Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) |
|
|
Policy makers in the Asia-Pacific region
are facing serious problems in addressing the tradeoffs
between choices for environmental protection and economic
growth. In order to find ways to make breakthroughs with
these tradeoffs, it is essential to introduce the greatest
possible level of innovation into the environmental domain.
Such innovations may include the diffusion of advanced
technologies, promotion of environmental industry, increase
in environmental investment, change in production and
consumption patterns, and so forth. These innovations,
however, may pose the risks of increased costs of environmental
protection and worsened adverse environmental effects
unless a delicate balance between the environment and
economy is adequately considered prior to their application.
It is, therefore, essential to assess the current and
possible future interactions between economic development
and environmental changes, and predict the effects of
innovations carefully in a quantitative and comprehensive
manner. |
|
|
The IEA sub-project aims to provide integrated
models of the environment and economy, as well as a strategic
database to assess the current and possible future interactions
between economic development and environmental changes,
and to predict the effects of strategic policy options.
This sub-project consists of the following components: |
|
|
* |
 |
Development of a set of integrated
assessment models including environment-economy
models (AIM/Trend and AIM/CGE), ecosystem/health
impact models (AIM/Ecosystem and AIM/Water), a material
flow model (AIM/Material) and an energy technology
model (AIM/Energy) based on the achievements of
an existing computer simulation model development
project, the Asia-Pacific Integrated Model (AIM)
project |
* |
|
Development of indicators and a strategic
database comprised of the fundamental database,
index base, model base and strategy option base,
which will be systematically linked to each other
and readily available for policy making |
* |
|
Assessment of the current conditions
and possible future changes of the environment and
economy, and the quantitative effects and implications
of proposed innovative strategy options |
|
(3) |
|
Research on Innovative and Strategic Policy
Options (RISPO) |
|
|
Efforts to achieve sustainable development
should integrate the three components of economic development,
social development and environmental protection, as interdependent
and mutually reinforcing pillars. Therefore, strategy
options that will lead toward sustainable development
are expected to contribute to the improvement of these
three pillars simultaneously. Practical and implementable
strategy options can be produced by improved collaboration
between natural and social sciences, involvement of various
stakeholders, and field-based studies, including those
that look at local and indigenous practices and study
actual circumstances. |
|
|
The RISPO sub-project aims to propose strategic
policy options and to provide policy inventories as knowledge-based
tools for informed decision making by examining information
about successful or failed practices collected through
field-based case studies. This sub-project consists of
the following components: |
|
|
* |
 |
Conduction of field-based case studies
in selected countries to formulate policy inventories
and possible strategic policy options in such categories
of innovation as creation of eco-markets and eco-industry,
introduction of advanced technology, development
of innovative urban systems, appropriate use of
community resources, and networking of small-sized
innovations. |
* |
|
Development of policy inventories,
which consist of a good practices inventory and
an innovative instruments inventory, from the data
obtained from case studies mentioned above and from
other existing projects, such as GEF projects |
* |
|
Proposal of strategic policy options
based on the analysis of practices and instruments
compiled in the policy inventories |
* |
|
Implementation of pilot projects on
selected issues and sites, in order to examine the
effects, feasibility and applicability of the strategic
policy options |
|
|
|
3.3 Linking the Project to Policy Makers |
|
The outcomes of the three sub-projects will be
presented to ECO ASIA, the ECO ASIA Panel and other meetings
of policy-makers, in order to support discussions for formulation
and implementation of policies for environmental management
and protection in the Asia-Pacific region. At the same time,
the sub-projects will benefit from guidance from the policy
makers so that these activities can best reflect the policy
makers’ needs. Also, in order to obtain guidance from a broader
perspective, the outcomes of discussions may be presented to
the Asia-Pacific Forum for Environment and Development (APFED)
and other international forums. |
|
Through such processes, a system of dynamic feedback
will be created between the scientific activities and policy
makers, ensuring close linkages between them. |
|
3.4 Networking, Capacity Building and Awareness
Creation |
|
Because APEIS is in nature a regional research
exercise based on innovative tools and methodologies, networking
and participation of relevant scientists and research institutes
in the region should be encouraged. At the same time, existing
research products on integrated monitoring and assessment in
the region should be fully utilized in order to implement the
project effectively and efficiently. For this purpose, it is
expected that the products of APN-funded projects will be incorporated
in APEIS. |
|
Capacity building is one of the highest priority
activities in APEIS. Capacity building activities will focus
on the needs of developing countries to participate in international
activities, understand policy options, conduct integrated monitoring
and assessments, and to enhance the expertise of individual
scientists and institutions. Participation in the scientific
activities in APEIS offers research institutes a good opportunity
for capacity building at a research level. In addition, outcomes
of the research activities are widely disseminated and shared
among research institutes and other bodies for their capacity
building through workshops and other measures. A series of capacity
building sub-regional workshops on specific issues, such as
integrated monitoring and data collection and modeling, will
be jointly organized by the APN and participating institutes
and organizations in APEIS. Capacity building of policy makers
is also explored through continuous provision of research outcomes
to policy makers. |
|
Another important determinant of the success of
APEIS is the level of stakeholder awareness. Thus, awareness
creation also commands a high priority. To this end, an information
outreach strategy is needed to provide outcomes of research
activities in a timely and effective manner, taking into account
the specific needs of each stakeholder -for example, researchers
in other sub-projects, policy makers, other interested scientists
and civil society. An information sharing and outreach system
will be established to raise stakeholder awareness as well as
to ensure transparency and accountability of the project. For
this purpose, the APEIS Internet website will be developed and
managed as a subset of the website of ECO ASIA. The types of
information made available on the website will include documents
on project design and implementation plans, and reports of findings
such as technical papers, summaries of technical papers and
overall summaries. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
4. |
Management Framework |
|
(1) |
 |
Each of the three main components of APEIS
is formulated as an independent international research
sub-project through research agreements between governmental
and/or non-governmental research institutes. The Research
Coordination Committee (RCC) has been established to facilitate
linkages and coordination between the three scientific
activities, and to develop draft research proposals and
research summaries to be reviewed by the ECO ASIA Panel.
The RCC consists of representatives of each sub-project
and the APN, and, as appropriate, also consider other
scientific aspects of APEIS activities.
Please see a
draft of the terms of reference and organizational arrangements
for the RCC to get more information.(PDF) |
(2) |
|
ECO ASIA is the principal audience of APEIS
to receive reports of these scientific activities, and
it will also provide policy guidance for the activities.
When required, outcomes will be reported to APFED and
other relevant international environmental forums, and
advice will be sought from these forums. |
(3) |
|
As one of its functions, the ECO ASIA Panel
acts as the coordination body between the scientific activities
and policy makers. It consists of senior officials from
Asia-Pacific countries, representatives from the endorsed
projects such as APEIS, and international organizations,
programs and networks. The ECO ASIA Panel will review
and endorse implementation plans and coordinate scientific
and policy aspects for projects endorsed at ECO ASIA.
|
(4) |
|
Japan's Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
will, within the budget available, provide the necessary
financial support for the implementation plans endorsed
by the ECO ASIA Panel, provided that the results are reported
to ECO ASIA and the research is implemented in compliance
with policy guidance from ECO ASIA. |
|
|
The framework of management and supervision mechanism
of APEIS is illustrated below. |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
5. |
Cooperation with Related Projects |
|
5.1 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) |
|
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
implements scientific assessments for the UN Framework Convention
on Climate Change. In contrast, other conventions such as the
Convention on Biodiversity and the Convention to Combat Desertification
do not have such a scientific body.
The aim of the MA is to improve ecosystem management by providing
comprehensive ecosystem information that will be useful for
policy making, to international conventions, national governments,
non-governmental organizations and the general public.
The MA, which was officially launched 5 June 2001, is implementing
assessments at the global level - and simultaneously, at the
regional and local levels - over the next four years. A final
report is due in January 2005. |
|
(1) |
 |
Global assessment |
* |
|
Evaluate impacts on ecosystems from perspectives
familiar to the general public, including food, water
and health. |
* |
|
Establish methodologies for integrated assessments,
including determination of characteristics and the status
of ecosystem utilization, development of future scenarios
and proposals of response options. |
(2) |
|
Assessments at the regional level |
* |
|
Plans are to target about ten areas, including
South Africa, Southeast Asia, western China, and others. |
* |
|
Utilize integrated assessment methodologies
practically at the regional level. |
|
|
Because APEIS is a research-oriented project,
while the MA is basically a review-oriented project, they are
fundamentally different in nature. In addition, they differ
in their geographical coverage and target/priority subjects
of concern. On the other hand, the MA does aim to assess conditions
of ecosystems, future scenarios and policy options, and to provide
ecosystem information that meets the needs of policy makers.
It also gives priority to the use of satellite-based remote-sensing
to assess the current situation. These aspects represent some
of the similarities between both projects.
Taking into account the similarities and differences of both
projects, cooperation between them would be highly desirable
for these reasons: |
|
* |
|
New knowledge on conditions and trends of
natural resources in the region produced by APEIS would
benefit the MA's assessments, since such data and information
for review are quite scarce in the region; and, |
* |
|
Feedback of the outcomes of the MA would
facilitate future improvements of APEIS since it would
enable the incorporation of methodologies that reflect
global trends and comparisons with other regions |
|
|
Bearing these basic thoughts in mind, an ecosystem
assessment project in western China, one of the regional components
of the MA, was launched on 15 June 2001 and is being implemented
as a joint activity of APEIS and the MA. It is expected to be
a good model of collaboration and to provide policy makers in
China with important information for sustainable implementation
of development in western China.
In ways such as these, by providing satellite- and ground-based
integrated monitoring data and analytical results using these
data and ecological assessment models, APEIS will contribute
to the regional assessments of the MA. At the same time, APEIS
will benefit from improved scientific capacity and better synchronization
with international developments, by receiving data and methodologies
from the MA. By deepening this kind of cooperation, further
harmonization of scientific methodologies (such as satellite
data processing and ecosystem modeling), and interaction among
scientists can be expected. |
|
5.2 National Performance Assessment and Subregional
Strategic Environment Framework in the Greater Mekong Subregion
(GMS) |
|
At present the ADB, in collaboration with UNEP,
NIES and IGES, is making a proposal to the GEF regarding the
launch of a project entitled "National Performance Assessment
and Subregional Strategic Environment Framework in the Greater
Mekong Subregion (GMS)." This project will develop national
and subregional environmental performance assessment systems
in the GMS and a subregional strategic environmental framework.
It will assist in the process of integrating environmental objectives
in subregional, national and local development policies and
programs and thereby support sustainable development.
Its expected outputs include (i) improvement of informed decision-making
through better understanding of environmental conditions, trends
and impacts, (ii) effective and efficient national environmental
program management and improved public accountability for results;
and (iii) responses to the national, subregional and international
demand for environmental information and performance assessments
on issues of regional and global importance.
APEIS and this project both target the Asia-Pacific region and
share many similar objectives and contents. In order to effectively
utilize limited resources, and develop the scientific tools
indispensable to the formulation and implementation of sustainable
development policies, both projects are being designed and will
be implemented with close collaboration. |
|
5.3 Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
(APN) |
|
The APN is a strong partner for APEIS. The APN
is an intergovernmental network whose mission is to foster global
environmental change research in the Asia-Pacific region, increase
developing country participation in that research, and strengthen
interactions between the scientific community and policy makers.
Its research, networking and capacity building activities are
important for the region and can contribute effectively to APEIS.
The annual report using APN existing publications and output
from synthesis seminars will be useful resources for APEIS.
Moreover, the holding of sub-regional workshops on integrated
monitoring and assessment, in collaboration with participating
research institutes in APEIS, will offer good opportunities
for capacity building, particularly to those researchers who
are potential contributors to APEIS and the APN in the future.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Annex |
|
Terms of Reference and Organizational
Arrangements
for the Research Coordination Committee
of the Asia-Pacific Environmental Innovation Strategy Project
|
|
MANDATE |
|
1. |
 |
The Research Coordination Committee of the
Asia-Pacific Environmental Innovation Strategy project
(APEIS/RCC) serves as the forum for coordination among
the scientific sub-projects of APEIS, namely the Integrated
Environmental Monitoring (IEM), Integrated Environmental
Assessment (IEA), and Research on Innovative Strategic
Policy Options (RISPO) sub-projects. |
2. |
|
The APEIS/RCC will: |
|
|
a. |
 |
Facilitate collaboration and coordination
among the scientific sub-projects of APEIS |
b. |
|
Develop draft research proposals and
research summaries of APEIS to be reviewed and endorsed
by the ECO ASIA Panel |
c. |
|
Incorporate scientific interests in
networking, capacity building and awareness creation |
d. |
|
Consider the inclusion of other scientific
matters as requested by the ECO ASIA Panel |
|
|
|
MEMBERSHIP |
|
3. |
 |
Each APEIS sub-project may appoint representatives
from participating research institutes to be members of
the APEIS/RCC. |
4. |
|
The Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change
Research (APN) may appoint representatives to be members
of the APEIS/RCC. |
5. |
|
The Secretariat of the APEIS/RCC, in consultation
with the APEIS/RCC members, may invite relevant ministries,
agencies and organizations to join meetings of the APEIS/RCC
as observers. |
|
|
SECRETARIAT |
|
6. |
 |
The Secretariat of the APEIS/RCC will: |
|
|
a. |
 |
Prepare for meetings of the APEIS/RCC
|
b. |
|
Act as the focal point for research
coordination among the sub-projects under APEIS
|
c. |
|
Implement other tasks, as requested
by the APEIS/RCC |
|
7. |
|
One or more participating research institutes
of an APEIS sub-project will be appointed by the APEIS/RCC
to act as the Secretariat of the APEIS/RCC. The appointments
will be on a rotation basis, in this order: the IEA sub-project,
the RISPO-sub-project, the IEM sub-project. |
|
|
MEETINGS AND OFFICERS |
|
8. |
 |
A meeting of the APEIS/RCC will take place
annually, unless otherwise decided by its members. |
9. |
|
At the commencement of the meeting, a chairperson
and one or more vice-chairpersons will be elected as officers
for the meeting, from among the participants of the meeting.
|
10. |
|
The officers will remain in office until
their successors are elected. |
11. |
|
Decisions of the meeting will be made by
consensus. |
|
|
AMENDMENTS |
|
12. |
 |
The initial establishment and later amendments
of the Terms of Reference and Organizational Arrangements
by the APEIS/RCC will come into effect when endorsed by
the ECO ASIA Panel. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|