Annex 4. THE 1972 OECD GUIDING PRINCIPLES
(GUIDING PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES)
Introduction
- The guiding principles described below concern mainly the international aspects of environmental policies with particular reference to their economic and trade implications. These principles do not cover, for instance, the particular problems that may arise during the transitional periods following the implementation of the principles' instruments for the implementation of the so-called "Polluter-Pays Principle," exceptions to this principle, transfrontier pollution, or possible problems related to developing countries.
A. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
a) Cost Allocation: the "Polluter-Pays Principle"
- Environmental resources are in general limited and their use in production and consumption activities 
     may lead to their deterioration. When the cost of this deterioration is not adequately taken into 
     account in the price system, the market fails to reflect the scarcity of such resources both at the 
     national and international levels. Public measures are thus necessary to reduce pollution and to 
     reach a better allocation of resources by ensuring that prices of goods depending on the quality 
     and/or quantity of environmental resources reflect more closely their relative scarcity and that 
     economic agents concerned react accordingly. 
     
 
-  In many circumstances, in order to ensure that the environment is in an acceptable state, the 
     reduction of pollution beyond a certain level will not be practical or even necessary in view of 
     the costs involved. 
     
 
- The principle to be used for allocating costs of pollution prevention and control measures to 
     encourage rational use of scarce environmental resources and to avoid distortions in international 
     trade and investment is the so-called "Polluter-Pays Principle." This principle means that 
     the polluter should bear the expenses of carrying out the above-mentioned measures decided by public 
     authorities to ensure that the environment is in an acceptable state. In other words, the cost of 
     these measures should be reflected in the cost of goods and services that cause pollution in production 
     and/or consumption. Such measures should not be accompanied by subsidies that would create significant 
     distortions in international trade and investment. 
     
 
- This Principle should be an objective of Member countries: however, there may be exceptions or special arrangements, particularly for the transitional periods, if they do not lead to significant distortions in international trade and investment.
b) Environmental Standards
- Differing national environmental policies, for example with regard to the tolerable amount of 
     pollution and to quality and emission standards, are justified by a variety of factors including 
     among other things different pollution assimilative capacities of the environment in its present 
     state, different social objectives and priorities attached to environmental protection, and different 
     degrees of industrialization and population density. 
 
 
-  In view of this, a very high degree of harmonization of environmental policies, which would be 
     otherwise desirable, may be difficult to achieve in practice; however, it is desirable to strive 
     towards standards that are more stringent in order to strengthen environmental protection, particularly 
     in cases where less stringent standards would not be fully justified by the above-mentioned factors. 
     
 
 
-  Where valid reasons for differences do not exist, governments should seek harmonization of environmental 
     policies, for instance, with respect to timing and the general scope of regulation for particular 
     industries to avoid the unjustified disruption of international trade patterns and of the international 
     allocation of resources that may arise from diversity of national environmental standards. 
 
 
-  Measures taken to protect the environment should be framed as far as possible in such a manner 
     as to avoid the creation of non-tariff barriers to trade. 
 
 
- Where products are traded internationally and where there could be significant obstacles to trade, 
     governments should seek common standards for polluting products and agree on the timing and general 
     scope of regulations for particular products.
     
c) National Treatment and Non-Discrimination 
   - In conformity with the provisions of the GATT, measures taken within an environmental policy, regarding polluting products, should be applied in accordance with the principle of national treatment (i.e. identical treatment for imported products and similar domestic products) and with the principle of non-discrimination (identical treatment for imported products regardless of their national origin).
d) Procedures of Control
- It is highly desirable to define in common, as rapidly as possible, procedures for checking conformity 
     to product standards established for the purpose of environmental control. Procedures for checking 
     conformity to standards, to be applied by an exporting country to the satisfaction of the importing 
     country, should be mutually agreed. 
 
e) Compensating Import Levies and Export Rebates
- In accordance with the provisions of the GATT, differences in environmental policies should not lead to the introduction of compensating import levies or export rebates or measures having an equivalent effect, designed to offset the consequences of these differences on prices. Effective implementation of the guiding principles set forth herewith will make it unnecessary and undesirable to resort to such measures.
 
 


